Archive for: 2007

15 May 2007

Are equities overvalued?

Following a series of articles and letters in the FT disputing whether US equities are under- or overvalued, I sent a letter. My contribution to the debate reflects our company’s use, in wealth management, of a ‘long-term asset model’ which, amongst other clever things, generates projections for future real returns from market indices.

read more Commentary by Stuart Fowler
13 May 2007

More grounds for scepticism about computer models of climate change

My first post on ‘the science’ of climate variance was very sceptical. No scientist, I do have experience of financial data analysis and the modeling of financial systems. Here is an interesting video from a group of Canadian sceptics, who call themselves Friends of Science

read more Commentary by Stuart Fowler
13 May 2007

The housing ladder: what exactly pushes it out of reach?

Surely a silly question! Rising prices relative to income make house prices unaffordable. I’m not a property economist but if I apply my expertise in both financial asset pricing and personal financial planning, I think I gain further insights. I hope some property experts will take these further.

read more Commentary by Stuart Fowler
06 May 2007

What you need to find out about charges when selecting an IFA

In “Advisers face questions over who pulls the strings” (FT Money, 5th May), Elaine Moore reports that it is now very difficult for consumers to select an IFA based on how they charge. Correct. ‘Fee-only’ superficially holds out the best hope of avoiding bias, but it wastes an adviser’s ability to game the commission system for the benefit if their client. It is also often a sign that the firm is predominantly a financial planner and cannot or should not be managing investment portfolios.

read more Commentary by Stuart Fowler
28 Apr 2007

Fidelity’s new retirement solutions: why semi-customisation of large asset pools does not work

Fidelity are launching in the IFA community a new solution combining the accumulation of funds for retirement spending and regular drawdown from a fund after retirement. The offering recognises some key principles of retirement planning:how long we live means there is uncertainty about how long the fund will live if we deplete it at the ‘wrong’ rate; retirement dates are nowadays fuzzy rather than precise planning horizons; the assets funding retirement spending plans are not necessarily all held in a vehicle called ‘pension plan’.

read more Commentary by Stuart Fowler
news archives

News Categories:

Popular Tags:

Last 12 months:

» Archive of older content

» About our insights
» About our commentary
» About our research

Bookmark and Share

© 2012 Fowler Drew | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement | Legal Statement - Site created by HEARDcreative
Fowler Drew is regulated by the Financial Services Authority. It is authorised as a personal investment firm to provide investment advice and discretionary investment management. It is an independent intermediary with no ties to any product firms and can advise on the whole market. It is covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. HS.